User talk:Seauton

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Žale

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ljubljana zale world war memorial 1 DSC 3911.jpg

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 00:24, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Thanks a lot! --Achim55 (talk) 09:24, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cimitero di Staglieno

Latest comment: 2 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, could you tell me exactly how Category:Graves in Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) is redundant? You're just removing most of the graves from their category, which is in no way a duplicate of other cats (Category:Statues in the Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) is completely unrelated; not all the graves display a statue and not all the statue in that cemetery are from a grave + a category is redundant in the case of a COM:OVERCAT, and this one is not). N.Longo (talk) 20:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for asking. They're redundant because the files or Categories appear twice under "Cimitero di Staglieno". What I did was to move those images that have no statues/sculptures, but only gravestones or chapels to "Graves . . ." and all those that have statues/sculptures to "Statues . . .". I believe this makes individual monuments easier to find, if they're only under "Cimitero di Staglieno" once.

Seauton (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I forgot to mention: notice that I've added "See Also" tags at the top of "Statues . . ." "Graves . . ." and "Reliefs . . ." Categories to make it clear that all the graves/monuments should be covered (hopefully only once) in these three Categories. I'm just trying to make this huge Category (Cimitero di Staglieno) somewhat easier to navigate, not so overwhelming to visitors/new browsers.

Seauton (talk) 20:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

In order to make a file/category easier to find it should have all the categories it needs! In this way if someone searches for photos of graves in Genoa he will miss most of the graves in Staglieno (see the category tree) and it's not redundant since in a subcategory are shown all the pics of statues in that cemetery (from graves or not) while in the other there are all the photos of graves in Stagliano (with statues or not), they are under two separate category trees. E.g. a photo of a statue in Palazzo di San Giorgio is categorized either in Category:Palazzo di San Giorgio (Genoa) - interior‎ and Category:Palazzo di San Giorgio (Genoa) - Sculptures‎, and not only in one of them. You can say a category is redundant only in this case of a COM:OVERCAT, so, for instance, if a photo is both in Category:Graves in Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) and in an higher level category such as Category:Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) N.Longo (talk) 21:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

When I'm making decisions like this, trying to better organise a Category (or a Category tree like "Cimitero di Staglieno"), I follow the suggestions in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Overcategorization - I'm trying to cut down on what is called "Category Clutter" in that article. The article agrees that too many Categories make things harder to find. (I don't make changes like this only on my own preferences for organisation; I try to follow the suggestions already posted by Wikipedians before me with a lot more experience.)

Seauton (talk) 21:08, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Well, but here we are on Commons and the rules are those written in Commons:CAT, plus I don't really see what the "category clutter" has to do with this specific case; since with are not dealing with "hundreds of categories, most of which aren't particularly relevant" and with none of the cases mentioned on that page. The usage of {{Cat see also}} should not replace the category tree, if you have a category about a grave in some way it must be in at least one category under Category:Graves (which, according to Modularity principle, in this case is Category:Graves in Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa)). At best, if there are enough images, you could create a subcat named "Statue of yyyyy in/at/of (not so sure about the better wording) Tomba xxxx (Cimitero di Staglieno) an other option could be "Statue of yyyyy (Tomba xxxx, Cimitero di Staglieno)" and this one will be categorized at least under Category:Statues in the Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) and Category:Tomba xxxx (Cimitero di Staglieno) but the second, since it is about the whole grave and not under Category:Statues in the Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa) anymore, it should be under Category:Graves in Cimitero di Staglieno (Genoa). I ping @G.dallorto, who recently did a huge work with photographs of Staglieno, thinking it will be interested in this discussion. N.Longo (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

PS: since when there are only bronze sculptures in Staglieno? Even if this were the case, which it is not, the standard structure must be followed and always categories about Statues or Reliefs are a subcategory of Sculptures, just like "Bronze sculptures" (which, in some more detailed cases, could be a sub-category of sculptures by material).

File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 2.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 2.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 2.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 1.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buenos aires chacarita vandor 1.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Günther Frager (talk) 00:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 10 DSC 3284.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 10 DSC 3284.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 10 DSC 3284.jp…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 14 DSC 3287.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 14 DSC 3287.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 14 DSC 3287.jp…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 4-DSC 3219.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 4-DSC 3219.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santiago cementerio justiniano 4-DSC 3219.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Signatur auf Grabstein

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Seauton,

gehört die von dir fotografierte Signatur zu diesem Grabstein? Ich bin vom Ansehen her nicht hundertprozentig sicher und finde auch sonst keine Informationen zu diesem Grab. Für den Artikel de:Hugo Emanuel Becher wäre es natürlich schön, wenn man nicht nur die Signatur im Artikel anzeigen könnte, sondern auch das Werk bzw. zumindest beides in eine Personen-Kategorie zu packen.--Berita (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Grüße, ich verstehe nicht alle Ihre Fragen, zum Beispiel den Hinweis auf Becher. (Ich glaube nicht, dass Becher irgendeine Verbindung zu dieser Skulptur hat.) Die Signatur von Terroir (1929) befindet sich auf dem Sockel der Bronzestatue des Mannes. Ich habe die Signatur überprüft, indem ich eine andere Skulptur (nicht auf einem Friedhof) desselben Künstlers betrachtet habe, und die Signatur stimmte überein. Gerne beantworte ich den Rest Ihrer Frage, wenn Sie mir das klären können. Grüße,

Seauton (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Usc paderewski 1.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Usc paderewski 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Usc paderewski 1.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:35, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Tirebiter 1.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Tirebiter 1.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tirebiter 1.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

As I see, you are the next victim of the fanatical fighter against panorama freedom and photographer bully A1Calafel. Because photographers in this project are just the doormats for such ego-shooters, I wanted to send you my solidarity greetings and thank you for uploading your great photos! Greetings Arabsalam (talk) 15:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Cimitero Monumentale della Certosa

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Ciao, sto mettendo un po' d'ordine nella categoria del Cimitero Monumentale della Certosa di Ferrara. Ho notato diverse tue fotografie caricate con una data errata in descrizione, come ad esempio questo: Ferrara vidoni scutellari 1.jpg, dove viene indicata come data 1816, ma è ovviamente impossibile, dato che la fotografia nemmeno era stata ancora inventata in quella data! Poi più sotto trovo invece indicata la data del 12 aprile 2019. La data dev'essere quella di realizzazione della fotografia, non del soggetto ritratto, sennò se caricassi un ritratto di mia nonna, dovrei indicare come data quella sua di nascita, quando invece appunto va indicata la data dello scatto. Per cortesia puoi correggere la data di tutte le tue fotografie? Grazie. 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇪🇺 L'Ospite Inatteso - I love to love you 09:21, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

La data è la data di creazione dell'opera d'arte. La data più recente, associata alla mia "firma" (Seauton), è la data in cui è stata scattata la fotografia. Nel caso di tua nonna, sono sicuro che sia preziosa, ma non un'opera d'arte con una data di creazione significativa per i ricercatori che utilizzano Wikipedia. Continuerò a utilizzare il modello "Artwork" e il parametro "date" come descritto in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Artwork - che specifica che il parametro "date" deve essere la "Date of creation of the original artwork".

47.145.5.86 18:16, 17 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Grave_of_Augusto_T._Vandor

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Grave of Augusto T. Vandor has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 吴语 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Banfield - Amenazas aquí 20:25, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Rudisill al 1.jpg

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rudisill al 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rudisill al 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Komarof (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Seauton

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Moscow vaganskoye mitljanskiy 1.jpg

And also:

File:Moscow vagankovskoye garanyan 1.jpg

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 21:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply